“Larry and Sergey have escaped all scrutiny and as far as I can tell, they’re still running the place,” Stoller said. ![]() Matt Stoller, a prominent Big Tech critic and director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project, said the pair are still “core decision-makers” at Google, regardless of their current title. “Page is extremely creepy and presents poorly,” the source said. One prominent industry source who has been tracking the proceedings described the Justice Department’s decision not to call the founders to the stand as a “tactical mistake.” The source argued the feds missed an opportunity to grill the notoriously reclusive Page – an enigmatic figure who former friend Elon Musk once claimed has aspirations of becoming a “digital god.” Instead, Justice Department’s antitrust lawyers grilled a number of current and former executives on Google’s payroll - as well as higher-ups from firms like Apple and Microsoft. Google faces yet another looming threat as it awaits a judge’s ruling on the Justice Department case alleging the company has maintained an illegal monopoly over online search. The 10-week trial concluded last month without an appearance by Page and Brin, who created Google’s search tool and held top executive roles as it rose to market dominance. During that trial, US District Judge James Donato slammed what he called a “disturbing” companywide effort to destroy evidence in the high-stakes case. The search giant is reeling after a shocking court loss to “Fortnite” maker Epic Games that could upend its lucrative Android app store business. Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have kept a low profile as the Big Tech firm weathers a series of critical antitrust court battles – and it’s part of a long-running pattern of avoiding federal scrutiny, experts say. ‘It’s everyone’s nightmare - the robot doesn’t stop’: Tesla recall and robotaxi crash throw self-driving car dream into crisis Woman claims Tesla’s technology enabled abusive husband to stalk herĮpic Games CEO blasts Google’s $700M settlement as ‘injustice to all Android users’ In other words if an instance has been discovered at that point which doesn't have the nofollow keyword in its rel, then the link will be followed.FTC nominee Holyoak could face fresh hurdle as critics blast weak Google settlement Now observes rel=nofollow in a link, if at the point the engine comes to follow that link, *all instances discovered so far* are marked 'rel=nofollow'.This does raise some questions and the matter is left open at this point. ![]() ie if it is internal according to its domain, integrity does not mark it as an external link or treat it as external, ie not following it. Despite collecting the data and possibly generating a warning, Integrity does not *observe* the rel=external at this point.This may be deliberate and is legal but there are serious SEO implications if it happens unintentionally. Now generates a warning if a link that appears to be internal (from its domain) but is marked rel=external.Fixes a problem with the link inspector not displaying all instances of the link url if it appears multiple times on a particular page.Opens and scans a list of links in HTML, CSV, plain text format, or XML sitemap.On finish, send an email, save a report, open a file or AppleScript, FTP the sitemap XML, and other actions.Scheduling made easy with a few easy clicks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |